The Interactional View Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

The Interactional View - Essay ExampleWhen she revoked the permission, I was so mad at her that I did non talk to her for a month, while I also blamed my male parent for enabling my sustains domination everywhere my life. By not talking, it means that I did not take place with her almost like I used to. The Interactional View helps me understand the impact of family relationships on family communication exchanges and some unrivalled behaviors. The Interactional View sees the family as a arrangement of units that influence one another. Indeed, in my situation, my mothers behavior affected my behavior, while I further connected my behavior to my fathers privation of action on the matter. In the context of a game, the rules are the following 1) If my mother decides on something, my father implicitly supports it by not questioning her decisions, and 2) Children must obey their parents because they know what is best for the former. These rules do not mean that my father is undern eath the power of my mother, but I can see that he wants to distract conflict with her. The result of the rules of the game in our family is that I lose my agency or carry over my life. My parents can change the rules as they wish, but I cannot do anything about it. As a dutiful daughter, I am bound by these rules. I may resent them, but I report to follow them because I believe in respecting my familys decisions. Apart from seeing the family as a system governed by the rules of game, The Interactional View asserts the existence of axioms of interpersonal communications. Family homeostasis is central to these axioms because it refers to the unspoken complicity of family members in preserving the status quo. The rules of the game, no matter how dysfunctional, can result to a sense of family homeostasis, though the homeostasis may not be best for the family as a whole or for specific family members. In my case, my parents and I contribute to the family homeostasis because no one directly questions or opposes the rules of the game. I follow my parents decisions, even if I do not always ensure with them, because saving their face and family values are more important to me than my autonomy. My father also implicitly supports our family homeostasis because he does not conflict with my mothers decisions. My mother also supports fathers decisions, though when it comes to their children, she is more vocal than my father. The first axiom of The Interactional View states that communication is so constant that to not communicate is a form of communication in itself. Watzlawick explains the concept of symptom strategy, where a person explains the cause of muteness as something external, and so verbal communication does not occur. The person makes it look like he/she cannot control his/her silence. One time, my mother asked me why I was not responding to her text messages. I told her that I was busy in the library, which was my symptom strategy. By not saying anythi ng through not answering her text messages, I warrant my action through a symptom strategy. In reality, I was mad at her because my best recall dose and I made numerous plans for the weekend, and I was quite excited to spend two whole long time with her. All of those plans