American civil revised

Ameri potentiometer accomplishedian cont polish off of 1861-1865 was the bloodiest contend. The fight was between United States (the Union) and the Confederate eleven slave states that proclaim that they had their own rights to drug withdrawal, thus, forming Confederate states of America which was headed by Jefferson Davis as the chair. The United States termed as the Union was made up of unfreeze States together with Border States that were on a lower floor electric chair Abraham capital of Nebraska lead by the Republican Party. The republicans were against the spreading of slaveholding into regions g everyplacened by the United States (the Union) this increased the desires of secession by the federati atomic number 53rn states.Nevertheless, the republicans refused to take for granted any secession rights from the southernern states. This thence guide to the civilised state of war which broke up on April of 1861, when Southern States forces attacked a military gene ralization of United States (union) located at Fort Sumter, in the South of Carolina, which was the in truth first state to secede. (Holt, 1978) Causes of the civil war Many historians argue that the civil war was caused by slaveholding come out of the closets. However, there is no one simple- headinged cause of the civil war.The war was caused by abstruse issues including slaveholding, party politics, and sectionalism, misunderstandings of nationalism, expansionism, economic differences and modernization during that period. All this issues contributed to the war. (Holt, 1978) thraldom Slavery is considered by legion(predicate) historians as the primary(prenominal) issue that caused the war other reasons were directly or indirectly related to thraldom. Historian Holt (1978), said, as the 1850s went on, an exacerbating, exhaustive and basic eachy pointless booking roughly slaveholding continued to be the main topic excluding all other issues.As Abraham Lincoln a Northern politician by then pointed out, the issue of thrall was the most important issue than other issues, he further states that indeed, so much much important has it become that no other national question can even get a hearing just at present. (Holt, 1978) The issue of thralldom was in congener to competition by sections or states for the control of territories. The demand of the Southern states for a code of slave in the territories was an issue world used by the Southern politicians to divide the representative Party in to two. The division of Democratic Party ensured the election of Lincoln and also the secession.Though, Abraham Lincoln did non reach immediate plans of abolishing slavery in the South, the Southerners all everywhere the South conveyed fears about the slavery future in the South the moment Lincoln took over, lede to tensions that lead to war. (Holt, 1978) The Southerners were also concerned about economic loss and racial equality that they may loss. In acc ordance to the Texas Declaration of Causes for Secession, declared that those states that were not holding salves were proclaiming the degrading doctrine that all men were equal respectless of color or race.According to this declaration, African people were an inferior race. This issue of slavery contributed a traffic circle to the civil war, the Southern states feared losing control of slavery to the federal government. On the hand the Union feared that the power of slavery was al crap unconditional the government. This led to the civil crisis of 1850s. States disagreements about the moral issue of slavery achievement of democracy and the debate about economics of slave plantations labor over free labor caused semi semi policy-making unrest in the states.This contributed to the Southern secession which triggered the civil war. (Levine, 1992) Political instability Political instability during that time was so fractured this contributed a lot to the civil war. Cultural and econ omic disparities contributed to widen the policy-making differences. Wars between the north and the south grew a lot more heated, peculiarly after 1850. Politicians and the judiciary of the two regions sent contradictory signals in move to appease each other. However, all the two parties were not satisfied.The Georgians (Southerners) felt that the national government which was mainly controlled by the Northern industrialists was not responding to their problems in their states. Thus, the Southern states started seceding, this could not be allowed by the Northern states led by President Lincoln. As a result the Southern states opted to use force by attacking the military installation of the United States (the union) the United States (Union) responded and the war began. Therefore, political instability was another cause for the American civil war. (Holt, 1978) Modernization fears by SouthernAnother cause of war was fear of modernization by the south, According to historians Foner (1970), when the North abolished slavery and started industrial revolution which resulted to urbanization, improved upbringing and reform activities like abolitionism, the truth that out of eight immigrants seven colonised in the North, added to the truth that the number of whites leaving South for North were doubly as those leaving North to South, this contributed to aggressive- defensive political activities of the South. These political animosities raise the prevailing tensions between the two parts culminating in the civil war.(Foner, 1970) early(a) historians argue that, people who owned slaves were the highly modernized people in the South. Traditional people were the ones and this group included the middle class whites who had no slave or owned a few number of slaves. The South common people struggled for secession as they believed in a guideword of freedom is not possible without slavery they also believed that slavery led to social equality between whites. On the oth er hand the Northerners oddly the republicans did make water a varied interpretation of the principle of 1776.This varied political theory is among the main causes of tensions between the Southern states and the Northern states and is among the many reason why the two regions had to fight the civil war. (Foner, 1970) States rights The rights of states was another issue that contributed to the war, Debate on if the Union was the one older than states or the other way verso fueled the on going debate on rights of states. The debate was on if the federal government was should have a lot of power over states or if the federation was just made up of sovereign states that had more powers than the federal, this argument added to the on going controversy.According to Stampp (1956), each part used rights of states arguments to their comfortable position and stird positions when not convenient. Stampp (1956) points out that, Vice President Alexander Stephens of the South confederate as one example of the Southern states leader who termed slavery as cornerstone of the confederacy at the beginning of the war. The Vice President further said that, civil war was not in regard to slavery it was about states rights when the Southern states were defeated.Thus, the issue of states rights created a lot of controversies that were among the many causes of the civil war. (Stampp, 1956) Who or what was to charge for the Civil War What to blame Slavery The questions remains was the war about slavery? The answer is yes. So slavery was to blame for the war. Supposing that there was no slavery then the war could not have happened. Or supposing that, there was no disagreement about slavery issue, the South probably would not have felt that their culture was being existed, and the Southern politician would not have sought to protect their rights to secede. (Stampp 1956) However, the war was not only about slavery it was also about the extreme rights of the states, if it had power s to leave the Union. Though, the North never went to the war to stop slavery, nor did president Abraham Lincoln have an agenda of stopping the war ones he became president, it is clear the differences in understanding of the slavery issue was a major contribution to the civil war. Being moral issue slavery caused division in political leaders of the South and the North and created the tensions that existed by then leading to the war.(Stampp, 1956) Who to blame Politicians The main blame of the war goes to the politicians who were political leaders on some(prenominal) sides of the North and the South. The South depended on economic dodging that relied heavily on slavery, their leaders such as William Lowders Yancey of Alabama and Robert Barnwell Rhett of South Carolina who was known as fire eaters knew that supposing the South lost its slaves, then, it would undergo hard social and economic effects that will ultimately break the economy of the South.(Stampp, 1956) Hence, any polit ical activities that threatened the end of slavery in the South received the solid attention of political leaders of the South many of whom owned slaves and who were ready to go for war to ensure that their rights were protected. These political leaders were able to turn many Southerners that it was important to fight, in convincing the people their mainly reassert the war by arguments which indirectly referred to slavery issue. The politicians of the North states were divided concerning the slavery issue and did not intended to go on war over that issue.However, they took a political stand of fighting when war came, similarly they can also be blamed for the war. (Stampp, 1956) Could the war be avoided? Ever since the end of the American war, there have been arguments on whether the war was inevitable or could be avoided. The question illicit different answers according to the perspective one is looking the issue from. The war was inevitable and was bound to happen. This is becau se the ideologies being held by the South and the North were different.In a situation where political differences are so pronounced it becomes hard for the two opposing sides to solve their differences amicable. Basing in mind that, what was at stake was a lot economic consideration, freedom, democracy and the issue of slavery it could have been hard to avoid the war. In addition the politicians especially from the south felt threaten and had to assert the power. Basically unless there was change of ideology on either side war was inevitable. Conclusion The civil war of America basically occurred because of differences in political ideology brought about by slavery.Slavery was a moral and economical issue that created a enceinte rift between the Southern states and the United States (union). Before the war, fractured political system resulted in widening of the rift. Another reason that caused the war was the need of states to have more freedom by seceding from the federation this coupled with other complex issues especially economic ones were the major reason why the war occurred. In addition politicians particularly from the South who felt that their culture was being threaten also contributed a lot to the war.As mention before slavery was the main cause of this who as one historian puts it without slavery there would not have been a civil war. (Stampp, 1956) Though, the war resulted in a lot of loss of life, damages and injuries, it greatly helped to correct the historical mistake of slavery and to emancipate the slaves, and bring equality and freedom to many slaves. References Foner, E (1970) Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men Oxford press Holt, M. F. (1978) Political Crisis of the 1850s Wiley, Levine, B (1992). one-half Slave and Half Free Hill and Wang, Stampp, K (1956) Peculiar Institution. Knopf