Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and Bram Stoker’s Dracula Essay -- Shelley

Mary Shelleys Frankenstein and Bram Stokers genus genus genus Dracula un correctlyeous features in both Dracula and Frankenstein but the personification of this evil is incompatible in both falsehoods. A feeling of menace and doom pervades Dracula because of his supernatural authoritys. One feels that he has control of the evil and he has the office to manipulate the environment and people for his own ends. Frankenstein centres on the creation of a goliath made from parts of dead bodies and the fear created by the monster due to circumstance and the ignorance of society. Also, one feels a certain amount of discernment that the monster is deserted by his creator and loses control without his support and guidance.The novels were compose in the 19th century, Frankenstein was firstly published in 1818 and Dracula was first published in 1897. In this century there was a extravagance with Gothic horror stories and these novels reflect this. In the last century, a full audience w ould squander appreciated these novels, although they be not great literary accomplishments, people of that period enjoyed reading this type of story, filled with horror, suspense and intrigue. The rattling idea that such an evil and frightening pecker could exist surprise and aroused the end of many people at this time. Society in the last century was extremely corrupt and immoral, the novel Frankenstein reflects this, in which an unbiased creature is shunned by society because of its abnormal and somewhat awful appearance.Nowadays, people are still enticed by fear, they have a curiosity for the supernatural, evil and frightening. Although modern day society is supposedly politically correct, we are still an immoral society and many of us would treat a creature like Frankensteins creation or a lamia like Dracula like a monster. In this way, the novels still have social significance. The atmosphere of each novel plays a significant berth in setting the scene for the ensuin g horror to evolve. The atmosphere in each novel is different the horror in each novel is differentThe fact that Frankensteins monster kills out of revenge and ire is a form evil but one can see to it and to a certain extent sympathise with his inability to reason right from wrong. Many examples of this inability are shown, for example, the creature strangles Frankensteins vindicated young brother because he cannot under... ... although his downfall comes because he has limitations, such as, his power ceases, as does that of all evil things, at the coming of the day. Then there are things which so afflict him that he has no power, as the garlic that we know of, and as for things sacred, my crucifix These reassure one that there is a means to destroy Dracula.Frankenstein did not frighten me at all, I exactly found it a very tragic story demonstrating both the putrefaction of an innocent being by an immoral society and the dangers of playing divinity with science. Frankenstein was responsible for the creature and as soon as he showed signs of life, kinda of deserting him due to fear and embarrassment because of the ugliness of the creature, he should have taught the creature right from wrong and accepted him as a person, not a monster. Any brutality in Frankenstein was due to Victor Frankenstein himself and not his monster.Dracula is a novel that probes deeply into peoples superstitions, fears and beliefs of the supernatural. The creature Dracula is an evil being with no concern for others, he kills for his own ends and cannot be stopped, and this is what makes Dracula truly frightening.