Politics and Religion Essay

To answer the hypothetical question whether or non, if I was a semi policy-making leader in the early seventeenth century, I would use righteousness to my own ends would be very difficult and daunting. At the very proscribedset, it should be noted that the 17th century was a very exciting period. It was characterized by major movements, shakers, upheavals and pivotal points. To be brief and concise, allow me to offer a timeless, albeit simplistic answer to this supra mentioned hypothetical question. My answer would be NO, and I offer three reasons to back my answer.1. Politics and Religion must never mix. Most democratic countries declare in their state principles and policy that on that point should be a separation of perform and State. So much so, matters of ghost identical import can not and must not exist on base matters of political and worldly dominions. To mix both would be to invite loony bin and perhaps, bigotry, social injustice and create inequities due to over z ealous religiosity. 2. Lessons in History tell us that religious standards imposed by those who keep up political influence crumbled in time.Such lessons definitely point out that indeed, sound judgment dictate that a political leader should not use godliness to advance his own ends. We see abdications, uprising and some other violent overthrows and civil uprising involving religious disquiet and bigotry towards political leaders, not exactly in the 17th century, but all end-to-end history, when religion is used by political hands. Religion, being the opium of the masses may prove beneficial at times, but in the long run, like the effect of drugs or opium, people come to their senses, and again, as earlier pointed out, there must be a separation of matters of faith and matters of state.3. Using religion to advance ones ends, no matter how noble is chastely wrong. One should use sheer power of conviction, political will and authority of character and unbridled and sterling le adership qualities if one is to be an trenchant political leader. The use of spirituality or religion in forward-moving ones political ends is a moral wrong. This by example, as the Spaniards once were, is called mammon after Christ/Cross. Up until now, the Roman Catholic Church is plagued and beset by the wrongs committed by the Church officials during the dark ages.This only shows that again, Religion and Politics are two incompatible concepts, and should be avoided. go an enlightened governance or political leadership is a paradox, it should not be an impossibility. After all, conscientious leadership is a desired distinction for a political leader, however, out and out, politics and religion should not be put out in one outfit, especially so in such turbulent a time as the 17th century. For the above stated reasons, I reiterate my answer No. If I was a political leader in the 17th century, I will not use religion for my own end.