Should The Supreme Court Essay Example for Free

Should The Supreme Court undertakeThe Supreme Courts power of judicial review should not be strictly hold in by a constitutional amendment because the simple fact what if you do a judgment that they are not in the right of? If the judge is proved wrong then it will be appealed. For an example we the passel shouldnt be judged because what if whiz commits the same crime and does it intentionally such as killing somebody and then someone does it to protect them and their family from harm if someone broke into their home and was coming at them and the solely thing was to kill them to keep from getting their children or self harmed. The cons of this is that what if we are wanting a fair play passed and it gets rejected and we the voters cant have any say of it. For example switching books in the schools for more modern technology like Ipads what if the children dont understand the work very well and inescapably more studying time, they wont be allowed to take them home. They sh ould make the law of going acantha to older days when all the technology wasnt out just books, pencils, and paperThe pros is that the Judicial kickoff can have the power to view the laws of the other two branches and has an important role playing of the read and balancing system. So when you sit down and think about it its like they are too some(prenominal) chiefs and not enough Indians. They are sometimes to many decisions and too many judges at one time.